Macbeth, Romeo & Juliet, Jekyll & Hyde, Jane Eyre, Pride & Prejudice, An Inspector Calls, Blood Brothers and the poetry anthologies — ideas, writing, decoding feedback, practice and model answers.
Papers 1 & 2 — reading and writing, a technique glossary, and practice on real linked sources.
Already written something? Paste any English Literature or Language essay — a mock, a homework piece, anything — no set question needed, and get the same feedback.
Progress, settings, SEN info and About — everything else, in one place.
Seven set texts — Macbeth, Romeo & Juliet, Jekyll & Hyde, Jane Eyre, Pride & Prejudice, An Inspector Calls, Blood Brothers — and both poetry anthologies. Everything for English Literature in one place.
Seven thinking steps that never ask you to already have an idea. Start where you actually are.
One ordinary sentence, rebuilt in five moves, until it's doing the work of a grade 9.
“Develop your analysis.” “So what?” Sixteen real margin comments, decoded into the exact move they're asking for.
The fastest way to understand a poet's choices is to be made to make them. Nine steps, then the same questions aimed at a real poem.
0 questions. Write, and get told exactly which move each paragraph is missing.
0 quotations, each tagged with the essays it answers.
The same question answered at grade 4/5, grade 6/7 and grade 9, annotated line by line so you can see exactly where each gap is.
What happens when, chapter by chapter or scene by scene — and what each anthology poem is about — with the moments that come up most in exams flagged. All seven texts and both poetry clusters.
Papers 1 & 2 — reading and writing, a technique glossary, and practice on real linked sources.
Paper 1 & 2 reading (Q1-4). A technique glossary, a seven-step guide for unpacking any unseen extract, and practice on original linked sources — no set text to revise.
Paper 1 Q5 descriptive/narrative writing. Eight steps that put you in the writer's chair — moment, angle, structure, imagery.
Paper 2 Q4 comparison (OAPTE) and Q5 planning — a real debate-topic bank and a scaffold for your own letter, speech or article.
Everything that isn't a subject: progress, settings, and information about the app itself, all in one place.
Your PETER profile, questions attempted, and vault stats.
Turn progress-saving on or off, check the build number, or send feedback.
What the evidence actually says works — and why the Quote Vault is built the way it is.
What this can offer students who learn differently — and what it can't.
Why this exists, and how it's built.
A ladder of rungs, every one answerable by looking at the page — none of them require you to already have an idea. Climb as far as you get, and you'll leave with a paragraph plan you built yourself.
You have the idea. It comes out flat on the page. This is the same sentence rebuilt five times — and then a bench where you do it to one of yours.
What they wrote in your margin, what they actually meant, and what it looks like when you fix it.
Nine steps that put you in the poet's chair — message, symbol, form, shape, word field, images. Then the same questions get turned on a real poem, and analysis stops being a guessing game.
A technique glossary, a seven-step guide for unpacking any unseen extract, and practice on an original source built for this app — The Last Bus.
Comparing two writers' viewpoints (OAPTE), a bank of real debate topics, and a planning scaffold for your own letter, speech or article.
Eight steps that put you in the writer's chair for descriptive/narrative writing — moment, angle, structure, imagery. Then the same questions get turned on a real extract.
Paste your whole essay and get PEAL feedback on the introduction, every body paragraph and the conclusion — plus a Harvard (Cite Them Right) referencing checker. Any subject.
What happens when — chapter by chapter or scene by scene — with the moments that come up most in exam extracts flagged.
Pick a question, write your answer, and get it back with your own writing colour-coded — and a clear statement of what each paragraph is missing. No grade, on purpose.
Paste an English Literature or Language essay — yours, a mock, a homework piece — and get the same feedback. No set question required, no account, nothing sent anywhere.
Tap the card to reveal. Grade yourself honestly — what you struggle with comes back sooner.
The same question answered three times — grade 4/5, grade 6/7, and grade 9 — with a marker's note on every paragraph. Not to copy. To see exactly where the marks appear, and what the next rung actually looks like.
Depth is the number that matters. It is the average rung your explanations reach, and it is where the difference between bands is made.
Not motivational advice — what the research on memory actually says works, and why a couple of the app's own features are built the way they are because of it.
Most revision advice is someone's opinion. This isn't — it's a short summary of a 2022 review of decades of memory research, plus practical tips for studying with ADHD from a university support team. Both are linked at the bottom so you can read the originals yourself.
None of this guarantees a grade, and no single technique works identically for every student. What's above is what the evidence points to on average — worth trying before you assume revision "just isn't for you."
What this can offer students who learn differently — and what it can't.
Every learner's different — dyslexia, ADHD, autism, whatever the label or none at all — so I won't pretend this was built to treat any of them, and no two students with the same diagnosis learn the same way anyway. What I can say is a few of the choices in how it's built line up with things that are well established as good practice, and tend to help some of these students more than most:
None of this has been tested as a therapeutic tool, because it isn't one. It doesn't replace an EHCP, a diagnosis, or someone who actually knows a particular student's needs. These are ordinary, well-evidenced design choices, not a claim to have solved anything.
Why this exists, and how it's built.
I built this for my own online students — a way to keep the exercises we did in lessons going after the lesson ended.
It's not AI. There's no model generating anything here. Every check in this app is a plain rule looking at what you've actually written — did you make a point, quote evidence, name a technique, explain what it's doing. It tells you what's there and what's missing. No grade, no mark.
It won't do the work for you, either. It doesn't rewrite your sentence and it doesn't hand you a "better version" of your paragraph — it shows you the move on a separate example and leaves you to make it yourself. If you're after something that writes your essay for you, this isn't it. If you want to get better at writing one, it is.
It doesn't collect anything. Nothing you type gets saved or sent anywhere unless you choose to send me feedback yourself.
This is genuinely how I teach — it's worked well with my own students for a long time. Thought you might get something out of it too.
Free. No login. Nothing to sell you.
This is a test version. It is free, it will stay free at the core, and it is being built by a teacher with the students using it.